Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On 19:30 on 29. 2015. 29. 19:30 on 2015, the Defendant used the gaps in which the victim D was placed a high saw saw within the Busan Northern District C Underground House (bank), and followed by the Defendant’s hand, and was in Australia money.

gallon s 5 market value of 600,000 won shall be deducted.

In this regard, the escape was stolen by means of escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness D’s legal statement (including, at the time, Handphones are put in the back part of the back part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part

E, F, etc. immediately before that, that the defendant was to take charge of the witness after that witness.

Man't make a statement to the effect that she had given fling

1. The legal statement of the witness F (the defendant deemed to be lying on the her her m or her m or the m or the m or the m or the m or the m or the m or the m or the m or the m or the m or m or the

In other words, the defendant and the victim did not know, and the statement that all of the two telephone calls were taken out when the defendant and the victim sent the phone immediately to the victim.

1. The legal statement of the witness E (a statement stating that the defendant who is living in the rear side of the victim shows his/her hands out to the rear Australia of the victim, and that the defendant confirms that the victim had no Handphone immediately to the breath of the victim);

1. Each investigation report (in the event of a crime, attachment) [the defendant did not steals the victim's handphones, but did so rapidly to the victim's own child and did so. However, considering the above victim, F, and E's statements and the fact that the victim did not have access to the above place at the time of loss of handphones, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant stolen the victim's handphones.]

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;