logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.08.27 2014가합9472
자동차인도 등
Text

1. Defendant C shall deliver one motor vehicle listed in the attached Table 1 list to Plaintiff C Co., Ltd.

2. Defendant C is the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim is as shown in attached Form 2;

2. As to Defendant C: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act): Decision on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Conclusion of the plaintiffs' partial winning of the defendant C (the defendant C has used and enjoyed the motor vehicle as stated in the order No. 1 from October 11, 2009, or there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the rent of the above motor vehicle is KRW 70,000 per day. Since the claim for return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the excessive repayment is a claim for which the due date has not been fixed, the delay damages should be calculated from the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case) against the defendant D against the plaintiff Eul (the plaintiff's primary claim for delivery against the defendant C, citing the main claim for delivery against the defendant C, and thus

arrow