1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The Defendant, who was liable for damages on September 21, 2013, left alone so that water can flow by negligence while performing the replacement work of the water tap in the Daegu Suwon-gu and 103 1303 dong 1303, a residence of the Defendant. As a result, the fact that the Plaintiff’s residence, 103 dong 1103 dong 103, 1103 dong 1103, and sucking out of the wall, which was the Plaintiff’s dwelling (hereinafter “instant water accident”), did not dispute between the parties, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the water leakage.

2. Scope of damages.

A. According to the items of evidence No. 4-1 to No. 4, the Plaintiff received hospital treatment due to the instant water leakage accident from October 28, 2013 to June 10, 2014, and paid the sum of KRW 122,900 (= KRW 56,700 KRW 34,200 KRW 16,90 KRW 16,00) to the Plaintiff. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 122,90.

B. The Defendant is obligated to pay 1.6 million won to the Plaintiff at the expense, such as the Doing Construction Work, etc., since it is necessary to replace the Doing and floor board in order to recover the Plaintiff’s residence damage caused by the instant water leakage incident, and 1.6 million won of the expenses incurred in performing the above construction work is the Defendant.

(원고는 도배공사 등 비용으로 6,998,000원이 필요하다고 주장하나, 이에 부합하는 갑 제5호증은, 샷시교체비용 210만 원이 포합되어 있는 점, 갑 제2호증의 각 영상에 의하여 인정되는 이 사건 누수사고의 피해정도 등에 비추어 믿기 어렵고, 달리 위와 같은 원고의 주장을 인정할만한 증거가 없다). 다.

The consolation money shall be determined at KRW 500,000,000, in consideration of the details of the occurrence of the water leakage accident in this case, the degree of injury of the plaintiff due to the water leakage accident in this case, and other circumstances shown in the pleadings

Therefore, the defendant's 2,22,90 won = 2,900 won to the plaintiff.