The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged was accepted by the Defendant with a proposal to offer 1-3% of the amount to a designated account by transferring the money deposited from the Defendant’s account from the Defendant’s scam scam scam employee to the designated account.

On November 23, 2017, at around 12:59 on November 23, 2017, the person who was infinite was misrepresenting the victim B to post a telephone, and "the damaged was involved in the case of the passbook."

Money held to confirm crimes is remitted to the virtual account of the Financial Supervisory Service.

“Falsely speaking, the victim wired the sum of KRW 88 million, including KRW 14:35,00,000 on the same day, KRW 17:07,000 on the same day, KRW 13,00,000 on the same day, and KRW 19:50,000 on the same day, to the bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant.

From 14:50 to 19:53 of the same day, the Defendant received an instruction from a person who was unable to cast his name, and transferred KRW 68 million, out of the money deposited into a bank account in the name of the Defendant to the F account (G) in the name of E, and KRW 20 million to the I bank account in the name of H.

As a result, the defendant assisted the crime of fraud of a person who is not a name, by facilitating the person who is not a name, to take the property through the phishing method from the victim.

2. Determination

A. An act of aiding and abetting under the Criminal Act refers to a direct or indirect act that facilitates the commission of a principal offender with the knowledge that the principal offender is committing a crime. As such, the crime of aiding and abetting and aiding and abetting the principal offender and the principal offender’s intent to commit an act that constitutes an act that satisfies the requirements for the formation of a principal offender. However, since such intent is an in-depth fact, if the principal offender denies it, it is bound to prove indirect facts that have considerable relevance to the principal offender in light of the nature of the object. In this context, what constitutes an indirect fact that has considerable relevance is based on normal empirical rule, the connection of the fact is based on the degree of observation and analysis.