The part of the judgment below No. 3 and the judgment of the court below No. 2 shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 제 1 원심판결 ⑴ 사실 오인 내지 법리 오해( 제 1 원심판결 중 판시 제 1의 죄) ㈎ 특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률위반( 도주차량) 부분 피고인은 이 사건 사고 직후 출동 경찰관에게 자신이 운전한 차량이 가해 차량 임을 시인하면서 자신의 휴대전화번호를 알려주었고, 즉시 보험회사에 사고 접수도 하였을 뿐만 아니라, 현장에 도착한 피해자의 부친 M에게 명함을 교부하여 자신의 신원을 밝히는 등 필요한 조치를 모두 하였다.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged on the premise that the defendant did not take all necessary measures. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts or misunderstanding legal principles.

㈏ 도로 교통법위반( 사고 후미조치) 부분 이 사건 사고 직후 도로 상에 교통상의 위험이나 장애를 초래할 사정이 전혀 없었으므로 피고인에게는 도로 교통법위반( 사고 후미조치) 죄가 성립하지 않는다.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts or misunderstanding legal principles.

B. The punishment of the lower court (the crime of the No. 1 and No. 2 in its holding: imprisonment with prison labor for 7 months, and the crime of the No. 3 in its holding: imprisonment with prison labor for one month) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence of the lower judgment of the second instance (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

(a) ex officio review ex officio the determination;

The first and second court rendered a judgment against the defendant, after completing a separate hearing as the order 368, 4038 (Joint) and the order 7891 of the Incheon District Court 2016, against the defendant, to which the defendant is subject to each punishment. The appeal was filed against each of the above rulings, and the court of the first and second court decided to consolidate the above appeals cases.

However, among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the crime No. 3 and the judgment of the court of second instance against the defendant shall be decided.