1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the part resulting in dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. On the 3rd of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase "which enables identification" under the 10th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written in such a way as to be able to be able to be identified.

According to the fourth decision of the first instance court, the fourth decision of the first instance shall be followed as follows: " January 27, 1952" " February 11, 1935."

On the fifth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the statement of No. 13 shall be written with the statement of No. 13 and No. 18, and each video of No. 19-1 through No. 3, respectively.

On the nine pages of the judgment of the first instance court, the following shall be added.

“The Defendant submitted a certificate of taxation by item of local tax (No. 20) by asserting that Defendant B paid the property tax imposed on Defendant B’s share in the forest of this case from 2011 to 2016.

However, the taxation certificate of the above local tax item can not be directly proved by the defendant B that local tax was imposed on the above defendant's share out of the forest of this case, and that part of it was paid at present, and that the defendant B paid it.

[] On the nine pages of the first instance judgment, following the second instance judgment shall be added to the following seven paragraphs:

7) According to the Defendants’ assertion, among the graves installed in the instant forests and fields, those graves AC, AD’s spouse, AE’s spouse, and AF were moved to the instant forests and fields since the 1970s.

However, the above AC, AD, AE, and AF are merely collateral blood relatives belonging to another household, not the lineal ascendants of T, W, and AB, who are the former owners of the forest of this case, including the defendants, and are merely collateral blood relatives belonging to the other household, and if the forest of this case is not owned by the plaintiff clan, they shall be deemed the forest of this case.