The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Around 22:46 October 15, 2019, the Defendant reported that he was unable to drive a cream at the lower part of C’s fat in front of his substitute driving on the front side of the Heungdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter “The Defendant”) on October 22:46, 201, and was called to the Defendant, and the Defendant was waiting for a substitute engineer to drive the Defendant’s vehicle on his own, and then the Defendant was able to see “A” with his father own hand and fat off the ebbbbbs, and k.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning 112 report handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing the case-related photographs

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of obstructing performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Four months of imprisonment to be suspended;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., when the defendant committed an offense in whole and in depth), the suspension of sentence is obvious; there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; efforts to recover from damage by depositing one million won for the victimized police officer; and circumstances before and after the commission of the offense, such as the situation where the defendant is clearly expected not to repeat the offense; and other circumstances that the defendant has before and after the commission of the offense; and