1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit include the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff is a council of occupants' representatives comprised of the occupants of the Dong-gu A apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") in the Cheongju-si, the Plaintiff is a council of occupants' representatives, and each of the Intervenors joining the Defendant (hereinafter "the Intervenor" in the case of each of the Intervenors joining the Defendant) is a person engaged in the management of expenses, etc. at the management office established in the apartment of this case (hereinafter "the management office of this case"), and the Estan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Estan") entered into an entrustment management contract with the Plaintiff for the management of the apartment of this case.

B. On February 5, 2014, the Plaintiff elected a new president. On February 25, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to Cheongju-si a report, such as the composition of the council of occupants’ representatives, changing the method of managing the instant apartment from the method of managing the instant apartment to the autonomous management. The Cheongju-si had the same year.

3. 24. The above report was accepted.

According to the change in the above management method, the Plaintiff employed a new complaint of the instant management office and received the transfer of the management work of the instant apartment from Estan. In the process, on July 30, 2014, the former president of the instant management office ordered the intervenors to leave the instant management office verbally, and thereafter, the Plaintiff employed all workers of the existing management office other than the above former president and the intervenors.

1. On July 30, 2014, the dismissal of the Plaintiff against the Intervenor is unfair.

2. Within 30 days from the date of receipt of the written award, the Plaintiff shall, instead of the original reinstatement to the Intervenor B and C, pay the amount equivalent to the wages that the Intervenor B and C would have received if they had worked normally from the date of dismissal to the date of determination, and shall be reinstated to the Intervenor D, F, and E, and may have been received if they had worked during the period of dismissal.