logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.12 2015가단130806
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 700,000 and as regards it, April 2015.

Reasons

1. On July 1, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between the Defendant and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 102 Dong 504 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) with respect to the lease deposit of KRW 100 million, monthly rent of KRW 700,000,000, and the lease period of the said apartment as of July 29, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and the Defendant has been occupying and using the said apartment until now. Although the Defendant is not the defect of the apartment, the Plaintiff argued that there is an error in the pipe pipes and acted non-cooperatively in solving the problem, and accordingly, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his intent to terminate the lease agreement on August 7, 2015.

Therefore, the instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated by the Plaintiff due to the Defendant’s failure to perform the contract, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant apartment to the Plaintiff and pay the unpaid rent of KRW 700,000,000 and damages for delay.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow