1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Grounds for this judgment of the court of first instance shall be as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows:

Therefore, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The plaintiff in the 2nd 17th eth 17th eth eth eth eth "the defendant."

4. 8 pages 8 up to 10 parts of “the National Land Planning and Utilization Act” through “the National Land Planning and Utilization Act” as follows:

(2) According to Article 56(1) and (2) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 52(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23718, Apr. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same), a person who intends to engage in development activities as above shall obtain permission from the Mayor, etc., and shall obtain permission for modification, except for minor matters prescribed by Presidential Decree, and even in the case of modification of matters for which permission for modification is not required, if modification is made, he/she shall, without delay, notify the head of the local government of such fact.”

The following parts are as follows: ① 4, 14, and 15 of the 4th 15th 4th 15 of the “The purpose of development activities, the area of land, and the permitted project period are included in the permitted scope of development activities, and the permitted project period is subject to the permission of development activities or the permission of alteration, and if the development activities are not completed during the permitted project period (see Article 133(1)5-2 of the National Land Planning Act).

"However, according to Gap evidence No. 4, the purpose of the business that the plaintiff applied for at the time of the preliminary review against the defendant is not the creation of the garage which is the object of the development activities of the Yongsan Port, but the creation of the camping site.