1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of the following parts, and thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment.

2. The entry into the register shall be made by converting "the plaintiff" into "the defendant" in the 8th page of the first instance judgment.

After the first instance court decision 8th 11th 10, “No material exists....... In light of the developments leading up to the failure to pay the remainder to the Defendant for the instant improvement project, which can be known by the entries in the evidence No. 9 through 11, the Defendant did not appear to have been caused by external factors, such as changes in the policy of the Seoul market for the instant improvement project as well as the waiver of business participation by LH Corporation, etc. However, considering these circumstances, according to the evidence as seen earlier, the sales price of each of the instant real estate under the instant sales contract can be acknowledged as having been determined within the scope of KRW 4,00,00 per average of KRW 3,00,000 and KRW 70,000 per 3,000,000,000 per the market price of LH land, and Article 4(4) of the sales contract of this case also requires the Defendant to pay the remainder at the time of payment, namely, the fact that the Defendant did not have made an excessive demand for compensation for delay of KRW 200.

3. The decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.