Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a "D" singing practice hall in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and a singing practice room business operator shall ensure that juveniles do not have access except for the hours prescribed by Presidential Decree, and he/she shall not sell or provide alcoholic beverages, or shall not employ or arrange a loan for entertainment.

Nevertheless, at around 02:00 on September 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered a singing practice room in which juveniles, E, F, and G are not allowed to enter (09:00 to 22:00), and (b) provided the said juveniles with 8 canns corresponding to a total of 32,000 won in the market price to sell alcoholic beverages; and (c) provided the said juveniles with 30,000 alcoholic beverages to receive 30,000 won from the said juveniles; and (d) provided the said juveniles with the said juveniles, the Defendant arranged a entertainment loan to provide them with entertainment by having them enjoy 30,00 won from each of the said juveniles; and (e) provided them with drinking and singing together with the said juveniles.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the code of practice of singing practice providers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of F;

1. Each legal statement of E and G in part;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F, E, or G;

1. H’s written statement (the Defendant asserts that there is no help for juveniles to do so).

However, at the present site of this case

F There is a consistent fact from investigative agencies to this court that the defendant has consistently sold alcohol to himself and attempted to do so.

As the statement is made, it is reliable because the statement is specific and reasonable.

In addition, the Defendant’s wife, who operated the instant singinging business, also recognized the fact that the investigation agency sold F’s drinking to F’s drinking and attempted to do so.

On the other hand, at the case site together with F

E and G investigative agencies have made the same statement as above F, but in this court, E drinks in this case’s singing, or the Defendant acknowledges the fact that E sells alcohol to E.

Domina. Domina.