logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.17 2013노5650
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The instant crime against the prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing is an act of intimidationing the victim living together with a dead speed and its nature is inferior, and there are circumstances where the defendant seems to have expressed violent inclinations to the victim besides the instant case. Meanwhile, the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and agreed with the victim that the defendant was repenting of the mistake, and the victim wanted the Defendant’s wife, and the Defendant did not have any other criminal power other than the punishment imposed by a fine for violating the Automobile Management Act in 2008, and all other sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, details of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., are considered, and it cannot be said that the imprisonment (in October and 2 years of suspended execution) imposed by the court below is too unjustifiable and unfair.

2. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow