1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, it is based on the premise that Defendant A’s house and materials exist.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage on September 27, 2007 with respect to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list, which is owned by D, and completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage on January 9, 2008 with respect to each real estate listed in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the attached list, owned by Defendant A.

B. On May 16, 2012, Defendant C determined the debtor’s maximum amount of the Defendant A and the credit amount as KRW 300,000 with respect to each real estate listed in [Attachment List Nos. 2 and 3] and completed the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage.

C. The Plaintiff filed an application for voluntary auction E with the Changwon District Court for each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) (hereinafter “voluntary auction”). On April 11, 2014, the Plaintiff received a decision to commence voluntary auction from the said court, and completed the registration of the entry on April 14, 2014.

F on November 10, 2014, in the instant voluntary auction case, the F obtained a decision to permit the successful bid as the highest purchaser.

E. On November 11, 2014, Defendant A reported the right of retention on the ground that there was a collection of houses and container stuffs, etc. living on each land listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2 and 3 in the instant voluntary auction case.

F. In the instant voluntary auction case on November 12, 2014, Defendant B contracted to KRW 300,000,000 for bringing-in and reclaiming soil and sand on each of the instant real property from March 2010 to March 2012, Defendant B reported the lien on the ground that the aforementioned construction was not paid. Defendant C introduced equipment companies regarding the said construction; however, Defendant C introduced equipment companies as to the said construction; on May 16, 2012, it was under the condition that the equipment cost was not paid, and around May 16, 2012, the maximum amount of debt was set at KRW 300,000,000 for each of the real property listed in the separate sheet 2 and 300,000,000, which was above the auction, but the land was not paid KRW 300,000,000.

G.F. On November 17, 2014, the voluntary auction court of this case.