logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.10.12 2018고단1545
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 1545"

1. On April 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the Yama elementary school located in 230, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., in order to ask questions to verify the facts from the slope E belonging to the police station in the U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., and U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S. (hereinafter referred to as “S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

2. In the above time, at the above place, the Defendant expressed the victim E as the victim’s “I am, f, and shot. I am out. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am in I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

On March 25, 2018, the Defendant, at around 15:00 on March 25, 2018, the first convenience store operated by the Defendant, who was in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, requested prompt calculation from the victim J (n, 80 years of age) who is a customer, thereby harming the victim by pushing the victim over the floor and harming the victim, which is not otherwise classified as requiring medical treatment for about 6 weeks, thereby causing an injury to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1545"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (re-Analysis of the whole process of visual recording at the scene of interference with the performance of public duties) 2018 Maz. 1716;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to K and L;

1. Written statements;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Investigation Report (Recording of telephone conversations between victims) - The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the recording record;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, etc.).

arrow