logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.03.08 2016고단974
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant, at around 14:15, operated the freight vehicle by Bribe, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, along the right to use the freight vehicle, from the side of Bribe on the side of Bribe, following the following:

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to tea inquiries and mandatory insurance inquiries;

1. Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act concerning facts constituting an offense, as well as selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the indictment room is that the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight vehicles B, as a consequence of the prosecution room.

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on July 14:15, 2016, while driving the vehicle, leading to the direction of the west-do, the front side of the C in the Asia-do.

There are lots of telegramss at the edge of the road, so in this case, the driver engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while neglecting this, and neglected to neglect the stroke in the front direction, caused the 41 electric poles owned by the Korean Electric Power Corporation located on the right side of the progress direction to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by occupational negligence so that the amount equivalent to KRW 5,988,456 would be equivalent to the replacement of the utility pole.

2. Determination - Non-guilty of the Victim’s Punishment (see, e.g., self-agreement) - Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 3(2) main sentence of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow