(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고정1357

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고정1357

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall be the Director D in the case of Namyang-si.

On February 8, 2014, at around 11:30, the Defendant assaulted the victim due to the following reasons: (a) the victim F (14 years of age, n, n, n) taking part in the E commercial building 202, which was divided by another student during class; (b) the victim’s head at the left-hand head part of the victim’s knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife on the floor;

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the chief executive officer and explanatory note;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, while giving attention to the same reflector as the victim, has come to end with the victim’s words “self-furcing four” and committed the crime of this case. The defendant paid 80,000 won to the victim by mutual consent, the defendant paid 80,000 won to the victim by mutual consent, and the defendant has lived with the victim in good faith without any special criminal records, and the degree of assault against the victim is relatively minor. The judgment on the defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion is taken into account all the circumstances indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, motive, circumstance, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime.

A. The Defendant alleged that he did not constitute assault but did not have an intention of assault since he did not commit an act of assault. However, the Defendant did not directly contact the body of the victim because he did not directly contact with the body of the victim because he did not commit an act of verbal abuse, abusive language, booming the body spatially close to the body of the victim.

Even if it is an illegal use of force against a victim, it constitutes violence, and Supreme Court Decision 2000Do5716 Decided January 10, 2003.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.02 2016고정1464

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.24 2013노3886

-서울고등법원 2016.09.01 2016노1621

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.08 2013노1801

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.21 2013노1213