logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단1992
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around February 28, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties was driving a D-to-purd vehicle on the front side of the gas station located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, on the road in front of the gas station in Seo-gu, Incheon, and the police officers belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station E in order to avoid drinking restrictions.

Accordingly, the background F(48 tax) and G(49 tax) of the police station E belonging to the Incheon Western Police Station E, instructed the Defendant to stop the said vehicle and get off the said vehicle by hand. However, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle without disregarding it, was sealed about about five meters by driving the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above police officers by using the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object, thereby hindering the police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning the crackdown on drinking driving.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, when driving the said vehicle that was damaged by drinking alcohol and escaped, the Defendant changed the course by the method of rapidly bypassing it to the area of the hospital located in the inspection team, and caused a number-free taxi located in the direction of the course to rapidly reduce the course.

Then, while driving the above vehicle and driving it, the Defendant violated the red signal on two occasions from the two intersections to the two intersections of the inspection team, was rapidly rounded from the one intersections to the one intersections of the inspection team, and continued to violate the red signal on three occasions over three occasions until the distance from the parallel of the inspection team.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle, committed an act of violation of signal or a violation of prohibition of change of course, thereby threatening or endangering others or causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. The report of the occurrence of the case, each internal investigation report, and investigation report (No. 49, . . .).

arrow