logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.13 2017고단67
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the Defendant, as the C representative director of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who employs approximately one full-time worker and operates software development and supply business.

The Defendant paid KRW 13,972,677, total sum of D wages (i.e., KRW 1,389,527, Jan. 1, 2016; KRW 2,425,583; KRW 2,162; KRW 963, Apr. 2, 2016; KRW 162; KRW 963, May 2, 2016; KRW 162; KRW 963, Jun. 2, 2016; KRW 162; KRW 963, Jul. 15, 2016; KRW 425,505); and KRW 428,53, etc., within the agreed date for retirement without agreement on the extension of the period.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable Act: Article 109(1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 subparag. 1 and Article 9 of the Workers' Retirement Benefits Guarantee Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act, the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

(c) Unwritten expression of intention to punish: Submission of a written application to punish D after the institution of the instant prosecution;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow