A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

피고인은 2015. 3. 28. 03:10경 서울 금천구 B에 있는 금천경찰서 C지구대 안에서, 자신의 친구인 D으로부터 폭행을 당한 사정에 관하여 신고하던 중 D이 지구대 안으로 들어오자 D의 멱살을 잡는 등 D을 폭행하다가, 그곳에서 근무하던 경사 E, 경장 F, 경사 G, 경사 H, 순경 I이 피고인을 만류하자, 발로 경사 E의 다리 부분을 3회, 경장 F의 정강이 부분을 2회, 경사 G의 무릎 부분을 1회, 경사 H의 정강이, 허벅지, 무릎 부분을 8회, 순경 I의 허벅지와 정강이 부분을 5회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted as above and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the boundary of police districts of E, F, G, H, and I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each statement of G, I, E, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on video recording files to the CCTV;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences and the choice of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]: six months to one year and four months [No person specially punished] [Pronouncement Decision]] of the defendant is generally recognized as a mistake of the defendant. In addition, considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, criminal records, and circumstances after the crime, the court sentenced the suspension of execution of imprisonment to the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.