The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances indicated in the records and arguments in the instant case, including the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects, that the amount of damage is not significant, etc., and that the Defendant was punished for larceny crimes several times, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime without three months after the execution of the last imprisonment was completed, the continuous punishment was committed, and that the Defendant was committed against the crime of this case, and that there was no continuous punishment, and that there was no recovery of damage, and other circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the circumstances and methods of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, economic situation, family relationship, etc., the punishment imposed by the lower court was appropriate, and that the lower court exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion, and that the sentencing judgment exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion.

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit, since the defendant's punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable as the defendant claims.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.