logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.05 2019고단3349
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2019, at around 17:49, the Defendant filed a report with the head of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 391-ro, 112 in front of the toilet Park, which was sent to the Defendant, and sought a statement by dividing the Defendant and D, and asked his personal information, and the Defendant resisted the Defendant who was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an offense and tried to take the arrested Defendant into the patrol vehicle, and resisted the face of the above C once, and raised a sign of the said C several times to the above C.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Details of 112 reported cases processing;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6-1 year and 6 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties [Determination of sentence] The crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is a crime detrimental to the function of the State by nullifying legitimate exercise of public authority, and requires strict punishment in order to establish national legal order and eradicate the light of public authority. The degree or contents of the defendant's exercise of the tangible power are not easy, the defendant's recognition of the crime in this case is against the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records shall be determined as ordered.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged is from the victim F (70) and the victim D (71) who was under the control of drinking acts in the park at the front park of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 391-ro, 17:21 on June 11, 2019, at around nine months in a 391-ro, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, E-si, the Defendant was under the jurisdiction of the management office

arrow