A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Among the facts charged in the instant case, each private document and each of the facts charged shall be exercised.

Punishment of the crime

around May 2009, the Defendant living together with the victim C from around 2007, 2010 to 2222, and had the victim living together with the victim, and had the victim raised a dispute with the victim, and had the victim taken the mind of respect to the victim, and had the victim raised a false complaint against the victim.

On July 6, 2009, the defendant prepared a complaint against the victim on the ground that the victim arbitrarily consumeds and embezzled the 60,000 won (China currency) received from the Chinese E Attorney-at-law on behalf of the defendant around March 4, 2009 for the purpose of having the victim be subject to criminal punishment at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Attorney-at-law office.

However, with respect to the above part of the bill 60,000 won received from the attorney-at-law, the victim transferred the bill to the defendant, and the remaining part of the bill 20,000 won was used under the permission of the defendant, and did not have used

Therefore, the Defendant submitted a false complaint to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office to raise the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The entry of part of C witnesses in the 17th trial records;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Statement of the police statement A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, letter, e-mail of March 30, 2009, and copy of deposit certificates of 40,000 copies

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 156 of the relevant Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act regarding the crime and the choice of punishment

1. As to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel, the defendant argues that the contents of the complaint prepared by the defendant are true and does not constitute a false accusation.

2. According to the above reasoning, according to the above evidence, the defendant won the case by entrusting the attorney-at-law in China to win the case, and delegated the right to receive the amount executed upon the lawsuit delegated by the attorney-at-law in China to C, and on behalf of the defendant by the attorney-at-law in March 4, 2009, C is 60,000 won.