The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, as the president of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City council of occupants' representatives, was the victim D, the chairman of the above apartment apartment council, was the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, and the resident representatives' meeting or the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, included the sum of the lease deposit for the building E located in Seongbuk-gu Special Metropolitan City, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in the rehabilitation liability, and became aware of the fact that on March 12, 2014, the Defendant filed a rehabilitation application with the Seoul Central District Court. On April 24, 2014, the Defendant agreed to remove the victims from the office of the resident representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives at Sung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 101, which was the chairman of the above apartment apartment, in order to dismiss the victims from the office of the resident representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives, and the said F did not know that the victims were sold in lots.

However, in fact, the victim did not have caused damage to the members, such as arbitrarily consuming the money of the members of the above apartment house, and there was no fact that the victim employed the seller and sold the apartment unsold in 101.

As above, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. In a judgment criminal procedure, evidence of criminal facts must be presented by the prosecutor, and even if the defendant's indictment is unreasonable and false, it cannot be disadvantageous to the defendant, and criminal facts should be proved by a judge with high probability to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (see Supreme Court Decision 91Do1385, Aug. 13, 1991). If there is no evidence to form a conviction to this extent.