The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal confirmed that the signal such as a green signal is a green signal, and two-lanes of the road near the Daegu Suwon-dong MBC broadcasting station was proceeding from the ebC four streets away from the ebC street room. However, the victim, who was going into three-lane, was found guilty of each of the facts charged in this case, even though the defendant was not negligent in the occurrence of the accident in this case, the court below found the defendant guilty on each of the facts charged. The judgment of the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim reported that the road near the Daegu Suwon-dong MBC broadcasting station from the investigation agency to the court of the court below was changed to the stop signal at the time of MBC distance from the ebC distance to the ebC distance. The defendant's vehicle was consistently stated to the effect that the vehicle driven after 30 seconds, was damaged by the victim's vehicle. The victim's vehicle was damaged due to the accident in this case, and the victim's vehicle was damaged by the backer. When considering the damaged part of each vehicle above, it seems reasonable to view that the victim's vehicle was parked after the victim's vehicle stopped. Taking account of the above damaged part of the vehicle, the victim's vehicle was caused by negligence in the course of performing the duty of ebC to the court of the court below and caused the victim's injury to the victim and the victim's damage to the victim's ebC distance at the same time.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit.