Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Where the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

around 10:40 on October 4, 2017, the Defendant, “2018 Highest 191,” was engaged in a publicly obscenity act, such as cutting down Hashe from the front of C in Busan City/Singu, and exposing his or her sexual organ, and exposing a large number of unspecified actors passing through the process of sexual intercourse.

Around 22:00 on October 12, 2017, the Defendant made a patent obscene act in a manner of cutting down a bomer when many unspecified people pass on the street in front of the E located in Suwon-gu, Busan, and cutting off the sexual organ by hand and shaking it by hand.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 191"

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each investigation report "2018 Highest 1790";

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

2. Selection of a fine for selective punishment (the punishment shall be imposed by a fine in consideration of the fact that the victims seem to have been suffering from considerable apprehensions due to the instant crime, the frequency of the crime, etc., and the fact that there is no force to commit any crime).

3. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

4. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

5. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes.

6. In full view of the type, motive, content, and consequence of the instant crime exempt from the employment restriction order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree and expected side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the employment restriction order, the prevention of sex crimes subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, and the effect of protecting the victims, etc., it is determined that there are special circumstances under which the employment of the Defendant shall not be restricted pursuant to the proviso of Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse. Thus,