Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. An automobile in violation of the Automobile Management Act shall be operated by the owner of the automobile or a person entrusted with the operation of the automobile by the owner of the automobile;

Nevertheless, the defendant from around 14:00 on February 3, 2017 to the same year.

2. Around 08:00, from a person whose name cannot be known, BNEW franchise XG vehicles owned by the KNEW Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. were purchased at KRW 1 million and operated at Macheon-si Won for the purpose of commuting to and from work.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by the mandatory insurance of motor vehicles;

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s failure to purchase BNEW franchise XG car mandatory insurance from around 14:00 on February 3, 2017

2. From around 08:00 to around 08:0, a member was operated for the purpose of commuting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written opinion, vehicle photograph, detection and report of crimes, detection of stolen vehicles, inquiry into mandatory insurance, perusal of the register of motor vehicle registration (A), and details of next inquiry;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of statutes;

1. Article 81-7-2 of the relevant Act and Articles 24-2 and 24-2 of the Automobile Management Act (referring to the operation of a motor vehicle by a person who is not the motor vehicle user), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and selection of fines, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 334(1)1 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 334 subparag. 1 of the seized evidence does not appear to fall under the ownership of a person other than the defendant, but it is difficult to view it as a thing that has been provided or intended to be provided in the criminal act) are examined, and the defendant is both aware of the criminal facts of this case and is against his mistake.