logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.15 2014나2017099
하자보수보증금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the part between 8, 3, and 11 and 2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as follows. In addition to adding a judgment on new arguments by the defendant in the court of first instance, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment 6] Articles 46(1), (3), and (4) of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 9405, Feb. 3, 2009; hereinafter the same shall apply), Article 59(1) [Attachment 6], [Attachment 7], Articles 62(3), and 106(1)2 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 19935, Mar. 16, 2007; hereinafter the same shall apply), and Article 59(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 19935, Mar. 16, 2007), and the structure and structure of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 46(1) and (3) of the former Housing Act; Article 59(1) [Attachment 7] of the former Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act shall not be deemed to have any significant defect in the structure or structure of the apartment. The purport of the former Enforcement Decree shall not be limited to 6.

arrow