(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.03.20 2014고합623

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.03.20 2014고합623

준강간미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 24:00 Gwangju Seo-gu, the Defendant: (b) sited on the right side of the victim (the age of 23) in the mutual singing room near the main point of “E” located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul; (c) and (d) humd the victim by force by force.

2. On September 9, 2014, the Defendant, in G Bank, located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, 19:00, put the victim who takes part in a sofacion without awareness, into the part of the victim’s sexual organ, she attempted to rape the victim who was unable to resist due to alcohol by inserting his/her sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ and inserting his/her sexual organ on the part of the victim’s sexual organ, but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Any statement made by the defendant in a part appropriate for such statement in this Act;

1. The victim's statement that fit the victim's statement in this court (the defendant and his/her defense counsel stated that he/she did not commit an indecent act against the victim only after drinking alcohol at the victim's singing room at the time and place of the ruling on the criminal facts set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article. The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to this court that the defendant was able to write his/her her ambry, and that the victim's testimony cannot be identified in detail at the time when the victim's ambry cannot be identified if the victim's testimony could not be identified specifically and directly, and it appears that the victim could not immediately report the damage because he/she had concerns over the optician industry's pre-the crime of quasi-rape and the disadvantage that the employer would be suffered from the defendant before the victim committed the crime of quasi-rape, and according to

1. The assertion by each video accused and defense counsel in line with the aforementioned video works (Hmotour technical expenses, I weather expenses) and the judgment of this court

1. The summary of the assertion is that the Defendant was in the body of one another under mutual agreement with the victim.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고합510

-광주고등법원 2015.09.10 2015노207

-광주지방법원 2015.07.24 2015고합135

-광주지방법원 2015.04.27 2015고합92

-광주지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고합596