The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument that the lower court erred in violating the sentencing guidelines or the principle of proportionality is ultimately unfair.

However, examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age character and character intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, the amount of punishment of the lower court, which maintained the first instance judgment that sentenced the Defendant to ten years of imprisonment, is extremely unfair, even when considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and his defense counsel as grounds for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.