A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 19:05 on October 25, 2018, the Defendant driven a B-person car with approximately 3 km from the solar airspace located in the lower 0.141% of blood alcohol concentration at the ebbbbbb in Daegu-gun, a Dag-gun, to the intersection of about 55-lane 97-98 East ebs.g., Daegu-gun, as in the ebbbbbbial airspace, as the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content at around 0.141%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those who are engaged in driving service of B physical-person car.

On October 25, 2018, around 19:05, the Defendant proceeded in the direction of gender in Daegu, depending on two laness in front of Daegu-gun C, Daegu-do, one of three lanes.

At night, the defendant is at night, and at that time, the defendant is driving at the rear side of EFa car driven by the victim D(the age of 32) who had a signal waiting in the same lane, and thus, the person engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as keeping a safe distance to avoid a traffic signal in the above EFa car, securing a proper operation of it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was driven by the victim D while driving in the same lane as stated in Paragraph 1 at the same time as that of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim D while in the front line of the same lane, due to the negligence of driving the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant, who owned the victim F, immediately stopped, and failed to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim D, even though the repair costs of the said EFa car, which was damaged to the degree to which the victim F, was damaged, and escaped.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.