logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.01.22 2019고단3987
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On May 9, 2007, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 28, 2008 and passed the parole period on May 7, 2008. Around September 25, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced five years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. and the sentence became final and conclusive on November 21, 2012.

Defendant

A On September 6, 2017, the Cheongju District Court sentenced the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud, which became final and conclusive on September 14, 2017.

Defendant

B is the owner of Dobong-gu Seoul Building D, and Defendant A is the lessee of the above subparagraph D.

Defendant

On October 13, 2009, A made a false statement that "A will pay 80 million won to victims E with the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the payment of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of

However, in fact, the Defendants prepared a charter contract with a deposit of KRW 80 million with a deposit of KRW 20 million, and the deposit of KRW 20 million actually received was limited to the deposit of KRW 20 million, and Defendant A was unable to pay the interest due to the absence of other assets. Defendant B was able to use the money borrowed from the victim for the repayment of the debt, so there was no intention or ability to pay the money within the agreed period even if he borrowed the money from the victim.

As above, the Defendants deceptioned the victim and transferred 43.5 million won to the corporate bank account in the name of Defendant A on the same day from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with each other.

arrow