1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 3,00,000 and each of the above amounts, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 101,281,317, and Plaintiff B, C, and D, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) E is a F bus owned by a public transportation company (hereinafter “Defendant bus”).

(2) On April 14, 2015, the Defendant is a driver driving the bus, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a car mutual aid agreement with respect to the bus. (3) On April 14, 2015, the Defendant was driving the Defendant bus, driving the Defendant bus, making a right-hand turn to the right-hand turn on the right-hand turn on the right-hand turn at the H T-distance Intersection in the Chang-si, Changwon-si G, Changwon-si, and the Plaintiff who crossed the right-hand

(3) Due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered from an injury, such as an external wound, blood transfusion, etc. 4) Plaintiff B, C, and D are children of Plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 to 4, Gap evidence 2-1 to 3, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4-1 to 3, and Gap evidence 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, E neglected the duty of ex officio care while driving the Defendant bus and caused the instant accident. Accordingly, the Plaintiff A suffered an injury, such as an injury to the blood transfusion due to the external wound, and the Plaintiff B, C, and D are children of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant, a mutual aid business entity of the said bus, is liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the said accident.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) comprehensively taking account of the following: (b) evidence Nos. 4 and evidence Nos. 6; (c) the video of this court; (d) the Msan Heavy Police Station of this Court; and (e) the fact-finding results and the overall purport of the arguments with respect to the Gyeongnam Police Agency; and (e) the Plaintiff provided a reasonable cause for the occurrence and expansion of the instant damage by crossing the crosswalk without permission in neighboring places; and (e) the Plaintiff’s negligence was limited

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed table of calculation of damages shall be the same, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis.