logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단5186
사서명위조등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the law of authorized brokerage at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 18, 2016, a criminal suspect who violates the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions by issuing a summary order of a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as an offense of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on February 18, 2016, and a fine of KRW 2 million as an offense of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on June 13, 2016.

On October 9, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.062% among the blood transfusion around 21:50, driven a DNA-si car from approximately 4 km away from the section of D 4km to the shooting distance of coefficient in Seo-gu in Gwangju Mine-gu, without obtaining a driver's license.

2. On October 9, 2017, the Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation: (a) on October 22, 2017, the Defendant was discovered in drinking control while driving a drinking without a driver’s license while driving a motor vehicle on a remote distance from the coefficient located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; and (b) was asked to request personal information from the background FF belonging to the police station of the department in Gwangju, Seo-gu to make a statement in the column of the driver’s opinion column of “the principal confirmed the above matters and was notified that his license is suspended due to a driving in the principal, and that he was notified of blood gathering.”

The phrase “G” was written in the name section below the phrase “,” signed and sealed, and delivered to F, who is unaware of the fact.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the G’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol (27 pages of investigation records);

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. The principal driver;

arrow