1. The Defendant: KRW 7,538,558; KRW 500,00 to Plaintiff A; and KRW 300,000 to Plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively; and each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) Plaintiff A and Defendant are members of G fishing village fraternity, while Plaintiff B are children of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C, D, and E.

(2) On May 24, 2016, the Defendant, at around 10:50, 100, set up a horse in front of the G fishing village fraternity Haa-gun H in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, for the purpose of moving into the dogcul.

However, the plaintiff A and the defendant were involved in fatherbing in the future of the defendant's movement. The plaintiff A and the defendant were batd and pushed down with fats.

In the above process, Plaintiff A’s accident occurred that Plaintiff A’s left side of Plaintiff A’s fourth fingers (out of a safety stacker) entered the Dongbang belt (out of a safe stacker) of the air-going flag that was in the Gu-dong (out of a safe stacker). Accordingly, Plaintiff A suffered from approximately 6 weeks of treatment of Plaintiff A’s left-hand 4 balance of the water-going 4 balance of the water-going 4 balance of the left-hand part, cutting off and pressure damage caused by Defendant A’s 4 balance of the left-hand part of the water-going part.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 2, 3-3, and 10-4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. (1) According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to compensate for damages to the plaintiff B, C, D, and E, as the plaintiff's spouse and children who suffered from the defendant's assault.

(2) As to this, the Defendant asserted to the effect that, as the Plaintiff A’s central loss and self-defense was self-defense or the Defendant’s act was self-defense, the Defendant is not obligated to compensate for damages caused by the instant accident, but the Defendant’s above assertion is not acceptable since there is no evidence

C. As seen earlier, the instant accident occurred in the course of dispute between Plaintiff A and the Defendant as a result of the light rail operation, and the light railer owned by the Plaintiff.