logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.09.18 2014고정1618
업무방해등
Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assaulting among the facts charged in the instant case is prosecuted.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was aware of the surrounding areas to sell the house in which he had resided before, and that the D living together with the victim C (53 years old, female) want to be involved in the Defendant’s home, and that he would eventually waive the Defendant’s home.

The Defendant already called that he had sold his house to the neighbors, and no longer sold it, and the Defendant left the cafeteria operated by the victim’s husband and wife, and the victim called the Defendant to pay the money previously borrowed from the Defendant.

1. On November 17:20 on November 201, 201, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim C in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force by forcing the victim, “F” restaurant in the “F” restaurant of the victim’s operation in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, for the foregoing reason, following the foregoing reasons, “I am going against a disturbance, such as shot, dys, and dysing, and selling money.” The Defendant sold money to the victim, thereby getting up two customers in the place, and preventing entry of five customers from entering the place.”

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim on several occasions, such as the date, time, place, etc. mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1) and the same reason.

2. Determination

A. There is a statement at the police station of the victim C as evidence that corresponds to the obstruction of business among the facts charged in the instant case. However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by C’s statement in this court, the Defendant was two customers at the time of the victim’s flabing, and the Defendant completed and calculated meals, the Defendant was in a restaurant for about 1 to 2 minutes, and the Defendant was in a restaurant at the victim’s flabing, and the Defendant did not know the fact that other customers entered at the time of the victim’s flabing, and the victim could not receive other customers between the police box and the police box.

arrow