logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015.02.12 2014다22291
임대차보증금
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by an independent party intervenor.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined that it is reasonable to view that the seal imprinted by the delegation of powers, each custody certificate, loan certificate, and loan certificate was forged by an independent party intervenor or I using the deceased’s seal impression, certificate of personal seal impression, etc. during the period of hospitalization in the hospital or after the deceased died, and that there is a clear and acceptable counter-proof to deny the contents of the statement, and that other evidence submitted by the independent party intervenor is difficult to believe, and thus dismissed the claims of the independent party intervenor.

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow