1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff alleged that he/she supplied the Defendant operating “B” by October 31, 2013, with fishery products, such as active fish, and was not paid KRW 32,441,00 for the goods.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 32,441,00 won for the above goods and damages for delay.

2. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the other party to whom fishery products, such as the above active fishing, are supplied by the Plaintiff, is the Defendant (hereinafter “B”), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the testimony of witness C, the other party to whom fishery products such as the above active fish are supplied by the Plaintiff is “D Co., Ltd.” in which the Defendant’s sales type C actually operated.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.