1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim modified in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant on February 25, 2015.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

It is identical to the judgment of the court of first instance except for the correction as stated in paragraph (2), and the decision in the trial is added, and it is also accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Part 1) The amendment of the first instance court’s 5th sentence of the 5th sentence of the 5th judgment is that “drashing the Defendant’s reputation by dinting and acting in good faith,” and the 6th sentence of the 6th sentence includes any number other than clearly indicating the number in the following cases: “No. 23” of the 15th sentence is deemed to be “No. 5”; “no. 20” of the 17th sentence of the first instance court’s 17th and 20th sentence of the 17th sentence of the 17th sentence of the 15th instance judgment is deemed to be “offort to take advantage of”; “ffortly” is added to “f for utilization” in the front of the 18th and 6th sentence, and deleted the “ffortly” of the 6th sentence of the 6th sentence.

3) With respect to the portion of “the scope of the obligation to pay wages” (from 20th to 11th page) that is part of the judgment of the first instance (from 20th page 19 to 21th page), Plaintiff A (1) whose benefits from March 1, 2015 to 31st day of December 2015 sought by the Plaintiff A after the dismissal of the instant case are KRW 70,306,210, and ② the benefits from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016 are KRW 63,304,070, ③ from October 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016 to KRW 14,067,570, ④ from December 1, 2016 to December 30, 2016 to KRW 67,767,75,767, and the Defendant’s claim for damages for delay from the Plaintiff’s 16th day of December 7, 2016.7.