beta
Text
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.
Reasons
1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 1, 3, and Eul evidence 1 to 5 (if there are serial numbers, including the whole of them; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the whole purport of the pleadings:
The defendant is a company established on April 23, 199 for the purpose of consignment sale, incidental business, and business activities related to the distribution of fruits. D is a shareholder of the defendant, representative director, C is a shareholder of the defendant, and the plaintiff is a shareholder of the defendant, and the plaintiff is the defendant.
B. The Defendant’s shareholder status Nos. 1 C 103,739 internal directors 38,086 J 6,375 Ga6,375 5 D 6,30 6,300 son’s 6,300 E 9,300 5,300 F 5,335 5,330 10 H 4,268 3,735 3,735 3,735 13,735 14 M 3,735 3,735 14,735 3,735 3,735 210,210 17,000 Defendant’s total number of shares issued and outstanding shares are as follows:
C. The Defendant’s articles of incorporation provides that the Defendant’s remuneration of directors shall be determined by a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders (Article 36 of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation), and that a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders shall be held with attendance of shareholders corresponding to a majority of the total number of issued and outstanding shares, and that a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders shall be made with the consent of a majority of the general meeting of shareholders (Article 22 of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation). (Article 22 of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation) On March 17, 2015, the Defendant held a regular general meeting of shareholders, including the approval of the annual report of accounts in 2014 (Article 1 of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation) from the Daegu-gu Q (RR Training Institute) (Article 171,00,000, the officer’s salary (Article 387,240,000,000 won).
3) The above general meeting of shareholders directly attended by the Plaintiff, C, D, N, F, and K among the Defendant’s shareholders, and J, L, andO are present at N on behalf of the Defendant (N, J, L, andO).
(4) Of the bill No. 2, the defendant's 180,252 shares were present.