beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. While occupational embezzlement from November 1, 201 to November 30, 2013, the Defendant has been engaged in the management of the said company’s account, the management of the corporation’s certified certificate, and the fund management as an employee in charge of accounting of the victim C in Ansan-gu.
A. While the Defendant had a passbook, corporate certificate, cash card, etc. of the SC Japan bank account opened in the name of the victim on behalf of the victim, the Defendant transferred the money from the said account to the account opened in the name of the Defendant, and used it at will as living expenses, etc., and embezzled it for the purpose of living expenses, etc. after transferring it from the said SC bank account to the account in the name of the Defendant, around October 19, 2012. From that time to May 14, 2013, the Defendant transferred KRW 39,900 from the said SC bank account to the Defendant’s name and used it as living expenses, etc. in mind, and embezzled it for the purpose of using it for living expenses, etc., as shown in attached Form 1, from that time, from that time to May 14, 2013.
B. On October 31, 2012, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 1,369,350, and used it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, from that time to October 7, 2013, from that time, and embezzled KRW 29,095,90 over 18 times, as shown in the attached Table 2, for personal purposes, such as living expenses, in which the Defendant used the passbook, authorized certificate, cash card, etc. of the SC Japan bank account in the name of the victim for his/her duties on behalf of the victim.
C. The Defendant stated the written indictment as “Singman on April 2013,” but appears to be an obvious clerical error of “Singman on May 2013, 201” in the indictment as “Singman on May 2013.”
As stated in paragraph (2), the refund of value-added tax and the subsidies from the employment agency shall be remitted to the national bank account opened by forging delegations, application for opening accounts, etc. in the victim's name.