The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant, the dental treatment of the defendant is required, and the relationship with his family is obvious. However, the inhalement of hallucinogenic substances is highly likely to be punished as a crime that causes harm to the society and the national soundness due to its toxicity, and there are several previous meetings of the defendant, including a prison term, and the defendant committed the crime in this case at 8 days after the defendant was discharged from the prison in the previous and the previous years, taking into account the various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the court below's punishment is unfairly heavy.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.