Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around November 20, 2009, the Defendant publicly insultingd the above F by openly insulting the victim F, with a large voice that “the Defendant would have come to a lower-year house and grow up with the lower-year house,” among the following: (a) the Defendant’s name-free letter or 20 customers, D, E, etc.; and (b) the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not take the same bath as the Defendant stated in the facts charged.

2. 판단 피해자는 수사기관 이래 이 법정에 이르기까지 일관하여, “당시 C사우나 여탕 탈의실에서 피고인으로부터 ‘저년이 감옥에 갔다 와서 괜히 저 지랄한다.’는 말을 들었다.”는 취지로 진술하고 있는바, ① 피해자의 위 진술은 비교적 일관되고 구체적이어서 자신이 직접 경험한 사실에 대한 것으로 보이는 점, ② 목격자인 D도 수사기관 및 법정에서 ’당시 피해자가 피고인에게 뭐라고 하니까 피고인이 피해자에게 공소사실 기재와 같은 말을 하였다.‘는 취지로 진술한 점, 기타 기록에 나타난 제반사정을 종합적으로 고려할 때, 피해자의 위 진술은 충분히 믿을 만하다고 보여 피고인이 피해자에게 판시 기재와 같이 말한 사실이 인정된다.

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument of the defendant and his defense counsel.

The Defendant’s reason for sentencing is to consider the favorable circumstances for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant denies a crime without reflecting his mistake, and there are some other circumstances that may be taken into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, and the background behind the crime committed in this case.