beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is the owner of the E-ground building at Namyang-si, and Defendant A operated a general restaurant in the name of “G commercial conference” in the above building between F and the husband.
1. Defendant A
(a) Any person who violates the Food Sanitation Act shall make a business report under the Food Sanitation Act to the competent authorities in order to operate the general restaurant business;
On October 6, 2016, from around August 29, 2017 to around August 29, 2017, the Defendant, in collusion with F, did not report to the competent authority, and carried out a general restaurant with the sales of at least an average of at least 7.5 million won per month by preparing and selling white bars and scams, scams, and scams, scams, etc. in a space of about 48 square meters in the name of “G prize,” and in a nearby valley in a valley, and by selling alcoholic beverages.
(b) A person who intends to occupy and use a small river, etc. in violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Conservation of Small Rivers and the Conservation of Small Rivers, shall obtain permission from the competent authority, and shall not construct a building or alter the purpose of use of a building, install a structure, change the form and quality of land, cut bamboo and trees, divide land, Stockpiling articles, etc. for a profit-making zone without obtaining permission from the competent authority;
On June 29, 2017, the Defendant, in collusion with F, occupied and used the flowing water and land of a small river without permission from the competent administrative agency from the beginning of June 2017 to August 29, 2017, by establishing a floor of 95 square meters on the H, which is an area where the interest on the development of a small river located near the said restaurant, and a floor of 20 square meters on the H, which is an area where the interest on the development of a small river was restricted, and by operating a restaurant.
2. Defendant B did not report to the competent authority, on March 30, 2016, the restriction that Defendant A is a small river of development-restricted zone interest as described in Article 1-1(a).