logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.09.06 2017가합10949
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 575,630,00 and KRW 517,630,00 among these amounts, from November 17, 2017 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation) in Suwon District Court Decision 2017 high-priced 26, the Defendant: (a) was delegated to the Defendant with the management of the multi-family house of D building G in Pyeongtaek-si Edong and F (hereinafter “the multi-family house in this case”); and (b) the Defendant was delegated with the authority to conclude a monthly rent contract with the Plaintiff from March 15, 2014 to September 2016; (c) provided the lessee with the authority to conclude the lease contract under the name of the Plaintiff without authority to conclude the lease contract; and (d) provided the lessee with the forged rent contract under the name of the Plaintiff for the purpose of 37 years of age and for the purpose of exercising the authority to conclude the lease contract with the lessee; and (e) provided the lessee with the authority to conclude the lease contract from March 15, 2014 to August 1, 2016 to KRW 208,000,000,00 for the Defendant received KRW 2000.

The Defendant appealed as Seoul High Court Decision 2017No2892, but the appeal was dismissed, and the appeal was filed by Supreme Court Decision 2018Do4969, but the appeal was dismissed and the judgment became final and conclusive.

B. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the above lessees to seek confirmation of existence of obligation with the Suwon District Court 2016Gahap1153, and 18 of them are the Suwon District Court.

arrow