1. The marriage between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is null and void in 2012 (Ga heading) No. 79.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence 1 and 2, with respect to marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant on September 18, 2007, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for nullity of marriage against the defendant on December 25, 2012 against the defendant, and the above court rendered a judgment that the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant is null and void on December 25, 2012, and the above judgment becomes final and conclusive on January 22, 2013. Thus, in light of the principles of international jurisdiction under Korean law or treaties, the jurisdiction of the court in Japan over the above case is recognized, and the validity of the above judgment does not violate the good customs and other social order of Korea, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was no legitimate summons against the defendant in the above lawsuit, and further, between Japan and the other country, the above judgment on the validity of the judgment has mutual guarantee between Korea and Korea, and compulsory execution has to be permitted under Article 217 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.