logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고합627
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to nine months of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon Giwon, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 13, 2014.

"2017 Gohap 627"

1. The Defendant, around March 2015, concluded a contract with the victim to purchase the said three parcels of land at KRW 2.5 billion and pay the purchase price until July 15, 2015 (by no later than May 30, 2015, the Defendant did not pay the real estate purchase price to the victim, without any real estate development project, while the Defendant did not pay the victim the real estate purchase price to the victim, in the office E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “E”) located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter referred to as “E”).

On June 2015, the Defendant continued to carry out a real estate development project by sending a certificate to the Z Co., Ltd., Ltd., which provides that a standard contract for private construction works will be terminated, and thus, the Defendant will carry out a construction project at all.

There is no decision to select terms and conditions as a better one.

After the authorization and permission was paid, us can enter into a contract with the superior advantage at the time of construction work, and us was aware of the victim's awareness by stating that she can choose as a good condition leading to financial rights. In addition, around September 2015, 2015, she made a false statement to the purport that "in order to obtain the authorization and permission for business progress, she should immediately prepare the development charges, she should prepare the development charges, and if she uses the money as the design cost and development charges for lending the money for the creation of a collateral security on the land, she would pay the land price with the said money."

However, the defendant is real estate.

arrow