1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 27,093,752 against the defendant and the defendant from April 5, 2010 to January 25, 201.

1. After remanding the case, the Plaintiffs filed a claim for damages due to the death of the deceased I and the death of the deceased J. The court of first instance partially accepted each claim for damages, and the Defendant only appealed the part on the claim for damages due to the death of the deceased I. As such, the scope of the judgment of the original instance is limited to the part on the claim for damages due to the deceased of the deceased I (hereinafter referred to as the “claim in the discussion of the scope of judgment”). The judgment of the original instance prior to remand partially revoking the cited part on the claim of the Plaintiff B, C, and D in the judgment of the first instance, and dismissed the above Plaintiffs’ claims corresponding to the cancelled part, while dismissing the remainder of the Defendant’s appeal against the said Plaintiffs and the appeal against the Plaintiff A, respectively.

Therefore, the part of the judgment against the Plaintiff B, C, D, and the Defendant prior to the remand was appealed. However, the judgment of remand was reversed from the judgment against the Plaintiff B, C, and D and the part against the Defendant against the Plaintiff A, and the remaining appeals by the Defendant were dismissed.

Therefore, the part against the plaintiff B, C, and D in the judgment before the remand was separated and finalized, and the scope of the trial after the remand is limited to the part against the plaintiff B, C, and D in the judgment before the remand and the part against the plaintiff A in the judgment before the remand.

2. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the part concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except in the attached Form No. 4, 16, 5, and 18 of the judgment of the court of the first instance, and except in the attached Form No. 8, the part concerning the reason of the judgment of the court of the first instance is as stated in the attached Form.

3. Parts to be dried;

D. On the other hand, the Plaintiff A suffered a considerable amount of the lost old age pension as the lost income due to the accident in the instant case, while the Plaintiff A, which was after the death of the said deceased, in 2010.