beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On April 10, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 2 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court. On June 24, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On December 23, 2009, the same court issued a summary order of 10 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On November 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 1 year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court at the same court at the Gwangju District Court at the Gwangju District Court at the Gwangju District Court at the same on May 11, 2017, sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Traffic Act) at the Gwangju District Court at the Gwangju District Court at the Gwangju District Court at the same time on November 20, 2017.
【Criminal Facts】
around 06:45 on April 4, 2020, the Defendant driven a DNA liquid sports vehicle with approximately 300 meters section from the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju North-gu to the front road of Gwangju Northern apartment, while under the influence of alcohol 0.086% of alcohol level around 06:45 on April 4, 2020.
On May 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 23:25 on May 24, 2020, while driving a D liquid sports car without a vehicle driver’s license on the front of the F store located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting alcohol in total three times in a total, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as making a red light on the face, opening a light view of the front of the G District in the Gwangju Seo-gu Police Station G District, which was dispatched after receiving a report 112.
Nevertheless, the Defendant “marn” and did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without good cause.
Summary of Evidence
"200 Highest 1853"
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on the oral statement of the driver;