Of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant, the order for compensation and the list of offenses in the 2017 Highest 2106 case (2) No. 11.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (No. 2017 highest 2106 highest 2017 highest 2106 highest : Imprisonment with prison labor; imprisonment with prison labor for one month; imprisonment for six months; imprisonment with labor for one year and six months; imprisonment with labor for one month; and imprisonment with labor for one month) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant and prosecutor ex officio, the defendant and the prosecutor filed an appeal against the whole of the judgment below, and the trial court decided to hold concurrent hearings of the above appeal cases. As long as the crime of the judgment of the court below against the defendant except for fraud No. 2017 Godan 2106 at the order No. 2017 and the crime of the judgment of the court below No. 2 is concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 10, 2017, and the above judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 18th of the same month on the same day, since the judgment of the court below No. 2017 Godan 2106 after the above judgment became final and conclusive, the remaining crimes except for the crime of fraud No. 1 and Article 27 of the Criminal Act from among the first judgment judgment of the court below, which became final and conclusive after the aforementioned judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At the same time, the judgment of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of second instance, except for the compensation order among the judgment of the court of first instance and the crime list (2) 2017 high group of 2106 high group of crimes against the defendant, and the remaining parts of the judgment of the court of second instance and the crime of fraud (2) are no longer maintained.

3. Of the lower judgment of the first instance court, the argument is shown in the argument that the Defendant and the prosecutor’s argument regarding the sentencing of fraud part 11 times the net 2017 high group of crimes (2).